John 21:15-19
When they had
finished eating, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, some of John, do you
love me more that these?"
"Yes
Lord," he said, "You know that I love."
Jesus said
"Feed my lambs."
Again, Jesus said,
"Simon, son of John, do you love me?"
He answered,
"Yes, Lord, you know that I love you."
Jesus said
"Take care of my sheep."
The third time
Jesus said to him.
"Simon son of
John, do you love me?"
Peter was hurt
because Jesus asked him a third time "do you love me?" He said,
"Lord, you know all things; you know that I love you."
Jesus said
"Feed my sheep.
Very truly I tell
you, you dressed yourself and went where you wanted; but when you are old you
will stretch out your hands, and someone else will take you where you do not
want to go."
Jesus said this to
indicate the kind of death by which Peter would glorify God. Then he said
to him, "Follow me!"
This passage has been on my heart pretty consistently for
about a year now. There are several
things to take away from this passage, all of them effect my life greatly in it’s
current state, but I think most of it is relevant in all walks of a Christian
life.
First I want to address the order in which Jesus gives his
replies. This, I believe, shows
something about the process by which he calls us to be disciples of His.
Throughout the passages of the gospels one thing becomes abundantly
clear when Jesus speaks: he is not afraid to scare people. Prominent among Christians today
are mindsets along the lines of prosperity gospel, or the phrase “God helps
those that help themselves.” These are
easy mindsets to adapt, I myself was a staunch believer of the latter for most
of my life. Unfortunately it’s just not
true. Take a look at Luke 9:60 where
Jesus tells followers to “let the dead bury their own dead.” If that doesn’t do it, try Mark 10:25 where
we are told that is “easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle
than to get to the kingdom of heaven.”
Those two passage need context I don’t have time to get into here today,
but one thing is clear from them that doesn’t need context: Jesus is not teaching
us to pursue our own interests.
The greater point I’m making above is that Jesus is not
afraid to speak in a brazen, controversial way that makes people
uncomfortable. Jesus teaches absolute
right and absolute wrong, and will not mince words and will make which is which abundantly
clear. If you want vagaries and easy
teaching, read Buddha. Jesus will challenge you every time. Every. Single. Time.
In the above passage we see both made clear. First, the statements about how Peter’s death
will glorify God is certainly meeting the uncomfortable guidelines, but that is
context that is added by our author, it is not the words Jesus spoke. The words He speaks however are still a
challenge.
Love is a word that is thrown around really whimsically in
our culture. Today I said I loved pizza,
yesterday I said that I loved weekends, tomorrow I will say that I love Peyton
Manning (Go Broncos!), but none of these are the love that Jesus is inquiring
about. Jesus is getting to the heart of
how Peter feels. Peter is a visibly emotional
person throughout the New Testament. He
acts rashly, makes mistakes, and speaks words that are sometimes better left
unsaid. Jesus is aware that probing
three times with the questions “do you love me” is not something that will
leave Peter happy. He is testing the heart
of that emotional, mistake-making, oft loose tongued individual. If Peter doesn’t really love Jesus in a way
that surpasses the way that I love pizza, Jesus will see an emotional response
that will show the shallowness of this love.
We see from the repetition of the answer that Peter truly loves Jesus, as a result, Peter is given different tasks.
The first response given is that He commands Peter to “feed
my lambs.” This is a contrast of the
second command to “take care of my sheep.”
We see that in the first command, lambs, not the adult sheep are where
the duty is assigned. Lambs require
caring in a different way than sheep, a sheep is more mature, and may need
guidance, protection, and advise on how to move forward in their life as a
disciple of Christ. Feeding lambs in
contrast could be merely charitable works.
Literally, the feeding of these people could be an interpretation
here. For example, charities that send
food to people in underdeveloped nations or run a soup kitchen are everywhere
in our country. Someone who volunteers
at these places can serve the Lord still, but may not be qualified to take care
of sheep. That takes wisdom and maturity
beyond feeding lambs.
In the final command, Jesus tells Peter to “feed my sheep.” We are now transitioning from feeding lambs,
to taking care of sheep, to feeding the sheep.
The sheep are mature now, but still need to be cared for in ways beyond
the care they provide themselves. These
sheep being fed are likely taking care of other sheep, per the second command,
but still need to be fed. This could be
emotional support or a variety of other ways.
I interpret this as the command to live in ministry. Jesus tested the heart of Peter, he
passed. His reward is that Jesus is calling
him into a life serving Jesus as a voice that preaches the gospel to gentiles,
but also teaches the mature Christian how to better themselves and be
encouraged in Christ. Only those with
the deepest, most genuine love for Christ should be taking these steps, thus
the need for three probes of that question.
I have long felt that ministry is my long term career path,
but do I pass the above litmus test for love of Christ? The honest answer is not yet, no. I love Christ, I love the things He has done
in my life, and the impact on the world.
Can I yet say that I love Christ so fully that I would lay down my life
in service to Him, without acknowledgement or exaltation for others for this
service? No, I don’t think I can
yet. I don’t think I could be dressed by
others and led where I do not want to go to die a glorifying death in God’s
name. I plan on getting there, but my heart
hasn’t been softened to that point yet.
The above is probably can be a bit hard to accept, that we
are called to a level of self sacrifice to simply disciple effectively in some
ways. That may be a challenge, but we
haven’t even talked about that dying part yet, I think most of you will really
hate that part.
These are all things we learn from the exchange, but now let’s
talk about the context that John provides in that statement about how Peter’s
death will glorify God. It’s important
that we recognize that while this is the context provided, and not the actual
words spoken by Jesus, that these are not unrelated discussions. The context provided is the intended meaning
behind Jesus’ words, the next step after feeding the sheep is sacrifice.
There will in all likelihood be moments in which you will
love your ministry for Christ. Feeding
sheep can be overwhelmingly rewarding, so can taking care of them, and feeding
the lambs can be so easy, it’s almost hard to see where sacrifice plays a
part. Again, let’s keep in mind that the
above is all Christ showing us an overview of duties of discipleship,
specifically being disciples of His. A
disciple is not just a student, it is one who is striving to be like the one
that is leading them. To be a disciple
of Christ is to be one that is seeking to be as much like Him as possible. Are you starting to see where sacrifice comes
in? If not, I have a joke that will
clear it up for you.
Knock, knock.
Who’s there?
Crucifixion.
Crucifixion who?
Nope, no punch line, the answer is crucifixion.
You cannot be a disciple of Christ without sacrifice,
because Jesus can’t actually be the Christ without that sacrifice. Actually, without it, he’s not only not the
Christ, he’s a heretic and a deceiver.
Point established? Great, let’s
proceed.
Sacrifice is hard.
Sacrifice is scary. Sacrifice is
uncomfortable, unnatural, undesirable, and so, so, so many other words that
start with “un” and carry negative connotations to virtually everyone. Sacrifice is also an undeniably present piece
in feeding the sheep. It may be letting
a near stranger sleep on your couch while they get back on their feet. It may be giving money to someone for food
when you’re already living off of ramen noodles. It may be walking to work while a friend borrows
a car. It may simply be having an
uncomfortable, awkward conversation with someone that needs to hear some
uncomfortable, awkward things. It may be
turning down a bigger paycheck to spend more time on your ministry
efforts. It might be losing your job for
speaking openly about your faith.
For some it will be having your fingers cut off one by one,
raped, and then set on fire for refusing to disavow Christ.
All of these things have been sacrifices made by disciples
of Christ. They range from uncomfortable
to “no, no way, I can’t, won’t, refuse, never, ever, ever, ever, other things
that add on to the run on sentence that proclaim 'I’m not bold/brave/faithful enough
to do that!'” That is not a statement of condemnation,
I can’t honestly say that I’m certain I’d face all of them either, it’s just a
matter of how sheep-feed ready we might be.
Regardless of where you are on the sheep-feeding readiness scale, one
thing is clear. If we are to achieve the
heights of discipleship and are ready to sacrifice to whatever extent God has
called us, we must be fearless.
Fearless is hard.
Fearless is rarely encountered.
Fear exists for everyone, unfortunately most often fear doesn’t just
show itself in reservations, it shows itself as hate.
I will be getting on a pulpit for a bit now (no, I don’t
consider the things I’ve written thus far to have been up-on-a-pulpity).
I have
been devastated over the past few years to see how people who love Jesus have
allowed fear to be more important than willingness to sacrifice. Particularly, I have seen that so many
Americans have decided that it is not their job to be willing to put safety or comfort
at risk to help a Muslim. That is not
Biblical, and frankly, it’s embarrassing to me that we are claiming to witness
to the world about the same God while we broadcast this.
Hear this and hear it well, God loves Muslims too, and He
expects nothing less from you. It is
again important to put the word love in context. Love does not mean that He accepts them
exactly as they are, flawless, and finding a different path to salvation. That is absolutely not true. Love means that His heart breaks over their
transgressions, that He values them as a person and wants them in His eternal
kingdom, it means that Christ was put on a cross with the hope that they
embrace the gift of salvation as well.
When we refuse to share God’s love with Muslims because we are too busy
condemning the actions of the radicals, we are losing our place in
discipleship. Christ’s commands were
never to help Him judge and condemn, but to love, and spread the good news to
every corner of the earth. When we take
the step to judge instead, we are sinning too.
We’re telling God that His cause is not worth casting aside fear for, or
worse, we’re letting God know that they aren’t worth it. That’s not our call to make.
Maybe your calling is not to go overseas. Maybe God doesn’t want you to be a covert missionary
in Iran or Saudi Arabia. That does not
mean you don’t have a role to play here.
As followers of Christ we are all responsible for spreading His word
unto the world. If we look at the
background of feeding lambs, one very interesting thing to note is that the
lambs are spiritually immature. For
those of us who have studied a discipleship circle model previously (can’t
break all of that down here unfortunately), it’s important to note that
everyone is at a level of spiritual maturity, believer or not. For those that do not believe in Christ or
any God at all, they live in a realm known as spiritually dead. This is an area that can be left behind, it’s
the bottom of the spiritual maturity scale.
In other words, they are lambs, and we need to feed them too.
This is not a call to say that everyone needs to work or
give financially for world mission organizations, but it is a call to say you’d
better not be spreading fear and dissent that intends to prevent others from
feeding them. This is incredibly
relevant at a time where I am saddened to see an outpouring of people saying to
just leave the refugees from Syria displaced.
Leave them in Europe, leave them in a state of homeless flight from a
corrupt government, just don’t bring them here.
Some might be terrorists after all.
Wait, what?
Leave them to starve, some might terrorists?
Christ was murdered on a cross for you. He had nails driven
through His hands and feet, was hung in the hot sun, was left in a state of
prolonged suffocation for hours waiting on death, with a crown of thorns on His
head, and a sea of unbelievers cheering it on as they shouted scorn and insults
at Him while he died.
Okay, but that’s Christ.
We are not God in human form, we are just humans in human form, surely
the call is different right? Let’s look
at the early church, those who experienced Christ in the flesh first hand, or
were taught by His personal disciples.
Have you heard of the Roman coliseums?
Does being eaten by lions in front of thousands of cheering spectators
sound much easier? That is the result of
their fearlessness. They could have
fled, they could have denied Christ, they could fought their persecutors, but instead
they filled Mufasa’s stomach.
Now most relevant of all, let’s examine how Peter, the
apostle who in this passage is said to be destined to glorify God with his
death. Did he die in combat? For a
political stance?
No, he was crucified.
Not just crucified, but upside down, he was crucified. This was by request because he considered
himself unworthy to die the same death as his Savior. He was willing to die a horrifying death, he
was not willing to be seen as an equal to Christ. So to clear up any confusion, glorifying God
can include finding death in a way that is a humbling of a standard crucifixion.
And yes, some might be terrorists.
A guarantee is that some won’t be. These are starving lambs, people who without
sanctuary, may never be anything but lambs. We have a call to feed them. That may not include housing them personally,
but it certainly includes refusing to spread fear that attempts to keep them
from being fed at all. You see, the fact
is that we are supposed to feed the terrorists if they come over too, not just the safe ones. We are called to live without fear, to
witness without fear. A risk of death
does not excuse you from welcoming them and feeding that lamb.
So please, I urge you, that even if you are not ready to be
fearless and handle this ministry yourself, that you don’t pick up the
pitchfork or light the torch. Don’t join
the angry mob that marches for the cause of keeping the refugee Muslims
out. The lambs need feeding, and that
feeding may result in some deaths along the way. That is in God’s hands, not ours, but even
more so important is that death is not an acceptable cause by which to refuse
the task at hand. I could go on and on
and on further here, but I’m going to leave it for now and simply remind you that
there are radicals that kill for countless causes all over the world, and
shunning any people group for any reason will never make you safe. We live in a broken world, murder happens,
death happens, terrorism happens. Are
you going to live in fear of it?
When you ponder this or other subjects where fear is playing
a factor in your decisions, I would simply urge you to ask the following
question. Am I willing to let someone
else experience eternal death for my physical well being? Put the eternal cause first and try to always
get to a point where you are fearlessly feeding sheep.
God bless.